Plain-English Explainer
AI is exceptionally good at distilling complexity into plain language β especially when you give it an audience to write for. The secret is telling it exactly what level to pitch at and what angle matters most to you.
The Recipe
Explain [topic or current situation] to me.
Audience: [who you are β e.g. "a smart non-specialist", "a 12-year-old",
"someone who knows the basics of X but not Y"]
Focus on: [what matters to you β the business angle / the policy implications /
the technical basics / why this is a big deal right now]
Format:
- Start with a 2-sentence bottom line up front
- Then explain the background I need
- Then explain what's actually happening now
- End with: what happens next / what I should watch for
No jargon without definitions. If you use an acronym, spell it out first.
For current events specifically
Use a model with live web access (Perplexity, Gemini, ChatGPT with Search):
Explain what's happening with [topic] right now.
Give me:
1. The 30-second version β what is this and why does it matter today?
2. The context β how did we get here? (Keep it to 3β4 key events)
3. The different positions β who wants what, and why?
4. What's unresolved β what are we actually waiting to find out?
Use up-to-date information. If developments from this week are relevant, include them.
Explain like I'm smart but not a specialist in this area.
For technical topics
Explain [technical concept] to me.
My background: [what you already know β helps the model pitch correctly]
I want to understand:
- What it actually is (not the marketing version)
- Why it exists / what problem it solves
- How it works at a level that's accurate but doesn't require a PhD
- Where most explanations get it wrong or oversimplify
Use a concrete analogy. Then tell me where the analogy breaks down.
Audience calibration
The level you ask for dramatically changes the response quality:
| Audience framing | What it does |
|---|---|
| βExplain like Iβm 12β | Strips all jargon, uses simple analogies |
| βExplain to a smart non-specialistβ | Assumes intelligence, not prior knowledge |
| βExplain to someone who knows X but not Yβ | Fills exactly the gap you have |
| βExplain to a [professional in adjacent field]β | Uses their vocabulary as an anchor |
π Leftover Remixes
πΆοΈ Spicy: βNow give me the counter-argument β why do smart people who follow this closely disagree with the mainstream take? What are they seeing that the headlines miss?β
π§ Mild: βGive me the one sentence Iβd say at a dinner party to show I understand this topic, and one follow-up question I could ask to seem like Iβve been following it.β
π° Budget: βWhat are the 3 things most people get wrong about [topic]? Correct each one in plain English.β
Prompt concept via Amanda Caswell / Tomβs Guide. Adapted and expanded for The Prompt Kitchen.