π‘οΈ Kitchen Guardrails
Practical AI safety β not corporate policy. How to use AI responsibly without overthinking it.
8 guardrails
How to Avoid AI Hallucinations
π³ Checking the chef's claim before serving it to guests
Read the guardrail
The Problem
AI tools are confident by nature β they generate plausible-sounding text whether or not the underlying claim is accurate. This guardrail helps you work with AI in a way that catches errors before they cause problems.
Practical Techniques
- Verify specific facts independently β any statistic, date, name, or quote that matters should be checked in a primary source
- Ask for sources β even though AI may fabricate citations, asking βwhatβs the source for that?β often reveals when itβs uncertain
- Try the same question differently β if you get different answers to the same question phrased differently, that inconsistency signals uncertainty
- Ask it to identify its own uncertainty β βWhat are you least confident about in that answer?β often surfaces genuine gaps
- Cross-reference important claims β for anything youβll share or act on, run a quick search
Red Flags to Watch For
- Specific statistics with no sourcing
- Historical claims that sound plausible but specific
- Named experts or studies that seem hard to verify
- Confident answers to questions that are genuinely contested
- Details that are too perfect or too neat
Kitchen Tip
Treat AI output like a first draft from a brilliant but fallible assistant β not a final product. The AI is excellent at synthesis and structure; humans are still needed for verification and judgment.
Verify Before You Trust
π³ Tasting the dish before it leaves the kitchen
Read the guardrail
The Problem
AI tools are confident by nature β they generate plausible-sounding text whether or not the underlying claim is accurate. This guardrail helps you work with AI in a way that catches errors before they cause problems.
Practical Techniques
- Verify specific facts independently β any statistic, date, name, or quote that matters should be checked in a primary source
- Ask for sources β even though AI may fabricate citations, asking βwhatβs the source for that?β often reveals when itβs uncertain
- Try the same question differently β if you get different answers to the same question phrased differently, that inconsistency signals uncertainty
- Ask it to identify its own uncertainty β βWhat are you least confident about in that answer?β often surfaces genuine gaps
- Cross-reference important claims β for anything youβll share or act on, run a quick search
Red Flags to Watch For
- Specific statistics with no sourcing
- Historical claims that sound plausible but specific
- Named experts or studies that seem hard to verify
- Confident answers to questions that are genuinely contested
- Details that are too perfect or too neat
Kitchen Tip
Treat AI output like a first draft from a brilliant but fallible assistant β not a final product. The AI is excellent at synthesis and structure; humans are still needed for verification and judgment.
Knowing When Not to Trust AI
π³ Knowing which dishes the chef is actually trained to make
Read the guardrail
The Problem
AI tools are confident by nature β they generate plausible-sounding text whether or not the underlying claim is accurate. This guardrail helps you work with AI in a way that catches errors before they cause problems.
Practical Techniques
- Verify specific facts independently β any statistic, date, name, or quote that matters should be checked in a primary source
- Ask for sources β even though AI may fabricate citations, asking βwhatβs the source for that?β often reveals when itβs uncertain
- Try the same question differently β if you get different answers to the same question phrased differently, that inconsistency signals uncertainty
- Ask it to identify its own uncertainty β βWhat are you least confident about in that answer?β often surfaces genuine gaps
- Cross-reference important claims β for anything youβll share or act on, run a quick search
Red Flags to Watch For
- Specific statistics with no sourcing
- Historical claims that sound plausible but specific
- Named experts or studies that seem hard to verify
- Confident answers to questions that are genuinely contested
- Details that are too perfect or too neat
Kitchen Tip
Treat AI output like a first draft from a brilliant but fallible assistant β not a final product. The AI is excellent at synthesis and structure; humans are still needed for verification and judgment.
Protecting Your Privacy with AI
π³ Not putting your secret recipe in the window display
Read the guardrail
The Problem
AI tools are confident by nature β they generate plausible-sounding text whether or not the underlying claim is accurate. This guardrail helps you work with AI in a way that catches errors before they cause problems.
Practical Techniques
- Verify specific facts independently β any statistic, date, name, or quote that matters should be checked in a primary source
- Ask for sources β even though AI may fabricate citations, asking βwhatβs the source for that?β often reveals when itβs uncertain
- Try the same question differently β if you get different answers to the same question phrased differently, that inconsistency signals uncertainty
- Ask it to identify its own uncertainty β βWhat are you least confident about in that answer?β often surfaces genuine gaps
- Cross-reference important claims β for anything youβll share or act on, run a quick search
Red Flags to Watch For
- Specific statistics with no sourcing
- Historical claims that sound plausible but specific
- Named experts or studies that seem hard to verify
- Confident answers to questions that are genuinely contested
- Details that are too perfect or too neat
Kitchen Tip
Treat AI output like a first draft from a brilliant but fallible assistant β not a final product. The AI is excellent at synthesis and structure; humans are still needed for verification and judgment.
Spotting AI Bias
π³ Noticing when the menu only features one type of cuisine
Read the guardrail
The Problem
AI tools are confident by nature β they generate plausible-sounding text whether or not the underlying claim is accurate. This guardrail helps you work with AI in a way that catches errors before they cause problems.
Practical Techniques
- Verify specific facts independently β any statistic, date, name, or quote that matters should be checked in a primary source
- Ask for sources β even though AI may fabricate citations, asking βwhatβs the source for that?β often reveals when itβs uncertain
- Try the same question differently β if you get different answers to the same question phrased differently, that inconsistency signals uncertainty
- Ask it to identify its own uncertainty β βWhat are you least confident about in that answer?β often surfaces genuine gaps
- Cross-reference important claims β for anything youβll share or act on, run a quick search
Red Flags to Watch For
- Specific statistics with no sourcing
- Historical claims that sound plausible but specific
- Named experts or studies that seem hard to verify
- Confident answers to questions that are genuinely contested
- Details that are too perfect or too neat
Kitchen Tip
Treat AI output like a first draft from a brilliant but fallible assistant β not a final product. The AI is excellent at synthesis and structure; humans are still needed for verification and judgment.
Handling Sensitive Topics
π³ Knowing which dishes require extra care in the kitchen
Read the guardrail
The Problem
AI tools are confident by nature β they generate plausible-sounding text whether or not the underlying claim is accurate. This guardrail helps you work with AI in a way that catches errors before they cause problems.
Practical Techniques
- Verify specific facts independently β any statistic, date, name, or quote that matters should be checked in a primary source
- Ask for sources β even though AI may fabricate citations, asking βwhatβs the source for that?β often reveals when itβs uncertain
- Try the same question differently β if you get different answers to the same question phrased differently, that inconsistency signals uncertainty
- Ask it to identify its own uncertainty β βWhat are you least confident about in that answer?β often surfaces genuine gaps
- Cross-reference important claims β for anything youβll share or act on, run a quick search
Red Flags to Watch For
- Specific statistics with no sourcing
- Historical claims that sound plausible but specific
- Named experts or studies that seem hard to verify
- Confident answers to questions that are genuinely contested
- Details that are too perfect or too neat
Kitchen Tip
Treat AI output like a first draft from a brilliant but fallible assistant β not a final product. The AI is excellent at synthesis and structure; humans are still needed for verification and judgment.
When (and When Not) to Trust AI
π³ Knowing your sous-chef's actual training vs. what they claim to know
Read the guardrail
The Problem
AI tools are confident by nature β they generate plausible-sounding text whether or not the underlying claim is accurate. This guardrail helps you work with AI in a way that catches errors before they cause problems.
Practical Techniques
- Verify specific facts independently β any statistic, date, name, or quote that matters should be checked in a primary source
- Ask for sources β even though AI may fabricate citations, asking βwhatβs the source for that?β often reveals when itβs uncertain
- Try the same question differently β if you get different answers to the same question phrased differently, that inconsistency signals uncertainty
- Ask it to identify its own uncertainty β βWhat are you least confident about in that answer?β often surfaces genuine gaps
- Cross-reference important claims β for anything youβll share or act on, run a quick search
Red Flags to Watch For
- Specific statistics with no sourcing
- Historical claims that sound plausible but specific
- Named experts or studies that seem hard to verify
- Confident answers to questions that are genuinely contested
- Details that are too perfect or too neat
Kitchen Tip
Treat AI output like a first draft from a brilliant but fallible assistant β not a final product. The AI is excellent at synthesis and structure; humans are still needed for verification and judgment.
Fact-Checking Creative Work
π³ Making sure the garnish matches what's on the menu
Read the guardrail
The Problem
AI tools are confident by nature β they generate plausible-sounding text whether or not the underlying claim is accurate. This guardrail helps you work with AI in a way that catches errors before they cause problems.
Practical Techniques
- Verify specific facts independently β any statistic, date, name, or quote that matters should be checked in a primary source
- Ask for sources β even though AI may fabricate citations, asking βwhatβs the source for that?β often reveals when itβs uncertain
- Try the same question differently β if you get different answers to the same question phrased differently, that inconsistency signals uncertainty
- Ask it to identify its own uncertainty β βWhat are you least confident about in that answer?β often surfaces genuine gaps
- Cross-reference important claims β for anything youβll share or act on, run a quick search
Red Flags to Watch For
- Specific statistics with no sourcing
- Historical claims that sound plausible but specific
- Named experts or studies that seem hard to verify
- Confident answers to questions that are genuinely contested
- Details that are too perfect or too neat
Kitchen Tip
Treat AI output like a first draft from a brilliant but fallible assistant β not a final product. The AI is excellent at synthesis and structure; humans are still needed for verification and judgment.
No guardrails match "".
Further Reading
AI-generated search summaries are being exploited to surface scam sites and misinformation at scale. How the attack works and practical steps to protect yourself.
A practical recipe for forcing AI to verify its own output before you trust it β layered fact-checking built into the prompt itself.
The definitive security reference for LLM applications β prompt injection, insecure output handling, training data poisoning, and the 7 other attack vectors every AI builder needs to understand.